Trilogy
Nic Green
Nic Green's Trilogy just might be the most well-intentioned misfire playing at this year’s Fringe.
Meant to be a three-part celebration of femininity, it instead comes across as an over-long and slightly self-indulgent production that has little to do with equality and more with creating multiple excuses for women to appear nude onstage.
"A waste of great talent. A waste of great ideas"
There are some genuinely good ideas at play. Part one is a 20-minute performance that’s meant as a passionate celebration of the female body but only comes across as superficially pleasant. Part two is a horribly misguided reinterpretation of a famed debate on "women's lib" from 1971, which is consistently upstaged by projected clips from the actual debate.
Part three is the most successful section, a look at the "Her-story" campaign and some brutal truths of how women are treated in the present, all underpinned by the song Jerusalem.
No matter what one thinks of this production, the skill and charm of creator Nic Green and her company cannot be denied. Everything is brilliantly rehearsed and executed, from complicated dance routines to choral line recitals.
Large chunks of the production are segments that require the company to speak to, and sometimes with, the audience. These almost always come across as warm, kind and intelligent.
But at nearly three hours in length, I have to question the point of it all. Though everything is slickly produced, there isn’t one truly original idea. In fact, it feels as if this is a production that is simply preaching to the converted.
It isn’t going to change anyone’s opinions or ideas, and it never manages to challenge any long-held notions of inequality. It certainly doesn’t further the cause of feminism, although it feels like it exists solely because of the hard work of past feminists.
The nakedness is also so constant that it feels more like a gimmick than a necessary production element. True, many women from the audience have come onstage naked, and if only one woman has slightly benefitted from such an action, then this is to be commended and celebrated. But this act is a personal triumph and frankly has little effect on the audience, thus making it more self-indulgent than an artistic necessity. And such action is never juxtaposed to modern beliefs of so-called appropriate female body images, thus such choices have little artistic merit and relevance .
In the end, Trilogy feels like a complete waste. A waste of great talent. A waste of great ideas. A waste of the potential to look at the way women are treated in society now and actively question: have we come any further? There is no answer supplied; there are only scores of women who stand onstage naked. I applaud any action that shatters any stigma one might feel towards the female body. But while this might benefit those that participate, it leaves the rest in the audience a bit cold.
From August 9 2009 to August 31 2009 at St Stephen's, Edinburgh (part of Edinburgh Fringe); show starts 19:30, running time 2:45. Tel: 0141 565 1000. From November 3 2010 to November 6 2010 at The Arches, Glasgow. Tel: 0141 565 1000. www.thearches.co.uk
Comments:
Clifton: I couldn't disagree with you more, Michael. This is, without doubt, the best show I've seen at the Fringe this year. I found it to be hugely innovative, moving and funny and wonderfully performed by an excellent young cast. On the night I saw it, the audience was fully engaged with the performance and no one was left 'a bit cold.' Finally, your comment that this was about creating opportunities for women to appear naked onstage, does you no favours and certainly isn't shared by most other critics - as highlighted below.
Agree? Disagree? Join the debate.
Sorry, you aren't signed in right now. You must be a member of the site to post your comments. You can sign in on the left-hand side of this page. If you aren't a member yet, why not sign up now? It only takes a couple of minutes.
What the papers said:
The Herald:
***** "Blazingly powerful ... tears come more readily as do the whoops and hurrahs"
***** "Blazingly powerful ... tears come more readily as do the whoops and hurrahs"
The Guardian:
***** "Angry, joyous, heartfelt, rigorous and radiant with hope"
***** "Angry, joyous, heartfelt, rigorous and radiant with hope"
The Times:
** "The range and quality of the movement vocabulary ... seemed as impoverished as the political analysis"
** "The range and quality of the movement vocabulary ... seemed as impoverished as the political analysis"
The List:
***** "Joyous, life-affirming stuff; an adrenaline shot to a movement that seems to have lost its way"
***** "Joyous, life-affirming stuff; an adrenaline shot to a movement that seems to have lost its way"
The Telegraph:
*** "Its mischievous feminist stance does become a little arduous, falling down all the well-trodden feminist pit-holes"
*** "Its mischievous feminist stance does become a little arduous, falling down all the well-trodden feminist pit-holes"
Share this review:

Subscribe to RSS feed