To be informed by e-mail when new reviews are added, all you have to do is sign up.

You'll then get an e-mail every time a review is added.

Copenhagen

Royal Lyceum Theatre Company

Owen Oakeshott in Copenhagen. Photo: Richard CampbellCopenhagen is a rare type of play. It is a literate script that is far more concerned with words and their meaning than it is with physical action or plot twists, and yet it doesn’t forsake character or dramatic tension.

"The play’s greatest strength is also its very weakness: its intellectualism"
Set in a purgatory-like environment, three deceased people try to make logical sense of an important shared event in their lives. The people in question are famed German scientist Werner Heisenberg, his mentor and friend Neils Bohr and Margrethe Bohr, Neils’s wife and confidante; the event that is being scrutinised is a controversial conversation between Heisenberg and Bohr that occurred in German-occupied Copenhagen in 1941 that just may have determined the outcome of the Second World War and the use of nuclear technology.

Every angle and possible meaning of the meeting is questioned, dissected, analysed and interpreted.

Ironically, the play’s greatest strength is also its very weakness: its intellectualism. Michael Frayn’s script is an excellent example of what is meant by the ‘well-written play’, meaning that the words are key and that it would probably be as effective on the radio as it is on stage.

This is a very smart play that throws scientific theories and terminology around and doesn’t bother to over-explain difficult concepts. This is a good thing if one is happy to think and figure things out while observing the dramatic action, but those that like having things set out for them, or those who have a fear or suspicion of scientific thought, will feel isolated.

All three actors are excellent, turning in performances that are well-polished and passionate. Owen Oakeshott’s Heisenberg is a young man desperate to be both understood and vindicated. Tom Mannion’s Bohr is a father figure who demands facts and details and questions every aspect of Heisenberg’s arguments. Sally Edwards’s Marhrethe is the voice of reason, playing both devil’s advocate and arbiter to the argument.

Director Tony Cownie has the difficult task of dramatising a two-and-a-half-hour intellectual debate and manages well. The blocking is well balanced, highlighting the constantly fluxing power struggle between the three characters, and the words are all well paced. The design concept is simple yet effective.

Intellectual plays are becoming rare, which is a shame because, as Copenhagen proves, they can make for very rewarding theatre. It's not afraid to be smart, and it manages to pose some rather fascinating points.

From April 17 2009 to May 18 2009 at Royal Lyceum, Edinburgh. Tel: 0131 248 4848. www.lyceum.org.uk

Comments:

Have you seen this production? What did you think?
Be the first to join the debate.

Sorry, you aren't signed in right now. You must be a member of the site to post your comments. You can sign in on the left-hand side of this page. If you aren't a member yet, why not sign up now? It only takes a couple of minutes.

 

What the papers said:
The Herald:
**** "An increasingly fascinating intellectual detective story ... played with deceptive lightness"
The Scotsman:
**** "Frayn's play represents a thrilling demonstration of the power of the word on stage"
The Guardian:
*** "The lack of action means you're sometimes more impressed that they have learned their lines than you are engaged with the big ideas"
The Skinny:
*** "Tony Cownie’s production is a solid one and the three actors make light work of the dense scientific principles"

Share this review: