365
National Theatre of Scotland
Two years on, it's unrealistic to expect that any National Theatre of Scotland production of a new text will come close to Black Watch. However, it's also difficult not to make the comparison when watching 365, since on paper it has a lot in common with its sensational predecessor.
It's an ensemble piece with a young cast. The text is by a hot Scottish playwright (David Harrower, whose recent work includes Blackbird), and informed by extensive research. Steven Hoggett, creator of one of the most touching scenes in Black Watch, is movement director. There are even flight wires, although here they are used rather differently.
"Much too sprawling and superficial to offer any real insight into the issues it tackles"
The problem is, the play is a mess. More than a dozen characters compete for attention, and it's difficult to care about any of them.
Perhaps this is the point, in a way. The play is about kids leaving local authority care and embarking on independent lives. They are helped by a social worker burdened with a heavy caseload that prevents her from sticking around long in any of the 'practice flats' where the young people are attempting to learn basic survival skills.
It feels as though a lot of research has gone into the creation of 365, and that recent news stories may have provided material. Truth is often darker and more sensational than fiction, but after a few ham-fisted scenes dealing with enormously complex social problems (such as the immigration of unaccompanied minors) it becomes clear that the work is much too sprawling and superficial to offer any real insight into the issues it tackles.
What is the purpose of 365? Most people are aware of the challenges facing both children in care and those who look after them, and despair when they read about cases of neglect and abuse. This production barely goes beyond the horror stories: a brief monologue or choreographed segment cannot convey years of emotional damage in any meaningful way.
Georgina McGuinness's design has the back wall of the Playhouse exposed, with domestic and more surreal settings created using beds, kitchen units and trees. Towards the end a very expensive-looking piece of set comes into play, but by this point it feels as though director Vicky Featherstone is just throwing gimmicks onto the stage in an attempt to disguise the glaring weakness of the material.
It's easy to see why the creative team wanted to explore this subject matter dramatically ' it's a real shame that the resulting production fails so spectacularly.
Until August 25 2008 at Playhouse, Edinburgh (part of Edinburgh International Festival). Tel: 0131 524 3333. www.edinburgh-playhouse.co.uk
Comments:
Dr Jim Goddard: A friend and I have seen the play. I didn't find it to be a 'mess' at all. Both of us were brought up in care and were understandably concerned that the play would misrepresent or otherwise stereotype the issues. If the production had focussed on fewer stories it would almost certainly have done so. The approach adopted was much more truthful and, in places, dramatic. The 'sprawling mess' is an accurate description of the leaving care system and I took that to be part of what the authors were seeking to represent. At the start, it could have done with clearer flagging up so that it was a little less confusing in the first 15 minutes or so. There are also other points I would quibble with, such as the representation of restraint through a dance routine. However, the ensemble approach worked well I thought. The play also gathered intensity as it proceeded. You ask 'What is the purpose of 365? Most people are aware of the challenges facing both children in care and those who look after them, and despair when they read about cases of neglect and abuse'. You couldn't be more wrong. The vast majority of people I know are either a) not aware and/or b) do not care enough to despair about the care system. Believe me, I have been working as a care leaver, an activist and an academic in this area for the past twenty years and I know what I'm talking about. I was prepared to see the play as possibly worthy and worthwhile but was delighted to get the bonus of an engaging, dramatic and original presentation. There were lots of stand-out moments for me and I was hugely impressed with what the writer, the director and the young cast had managed to put together.
Agree? Disagree? Join the debate.
Sorry, you aren't signed in right now. You must be a member of the site to post your comments. You can sign in on the left-hand side of this page. If you aren't a member yet, why not sign up now? It only takes a couple of minutes.
What the papers said:
The Guardian:
*** "It still feels like the raw material of drama rather than the finished article"
*** "It still feels like the raw material of drama rather than the finished article"
The Scotsman:
**** "Beautiful, haunting, exasperating, drenched in sadness"
**** "Beautiful, haunting, exasperating, drenched in sadness"
Scotland on Sunday:
** "A let-down... little you couldn't get from a slightly racier Tracy Beaker"
** "A let-down... little you couldn't get from a slightly racier Tracy Beaker"
The Telegraph:
"A self-indulgent flop... alarmingly encumbered by many of the current clich's of physical and visual theatre"
"A self-indulgent flop... alarmingly encumbered by many of the current clich's of physical and visual theatre"
Blog verdicts:
Mark Gorman:
"I think it could do with a touch of editing but overall this is an important, thought-provoking and engaging piece of work"
"I think it could do with a touch of editing but overall this is an important, thought-provoking and engaging piece of work"
View from the Stalls:
"They now have a couple of weeks to sort it out before a run in London. If they don't, I suspect it could be in for a real critical mauling"
"They now have a couple of weeks to sort it out before a run in London. If they don't, I suspect it could be in for a real critical mauling"
Share this review:

Subscribe to RSS feed